From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Interest of J.P.

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Jan 9, 2020
942 N.W.2d 17 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

Summary

stating if a parent does not challenge a step in the analysis, we need not address it

Summary of this case from In re C.R.

Opinion

No. 19-1633

01-09-2020

In the INTEREST OF J.P., G.P., J.H., and L.H., Minor Children, K.W., Mother, Appellant, J.H., Father of J.H. and L.H., Appellant.

William P. Baresel of Prichard Law Office, PC, Charles City, for appellant mother. Mark A. Milder, Denver, for appellant father of J.H. and L.H. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State. Alesha Michelle Sigmeth Roberts, Clarion, attorney and guardian ad litem for minor children.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904

A mother and father separately appeal the juvenile court's termination of their parental rights. AFFIRMED ON BOTH APPEALS.

AFFIRMED ON BOTH APPEALS.


Summaries of

In re Interest of J.P.

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Jan 9, 2020
942 N.W.2d 17 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

stating if a parent does not challenge a step in the analysis, we need not address it

Summary of this case from In re C.R.
Case details for

In re Interest of J.P.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF J.P., G.P., J.H., and L.H., Minor Children, K.W.…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

Date published: Jan 9, 2020

Citations

942 N.W.2d 17 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

Citing Cases

People v. J.M. (In re J.M.)

But we need only address those issues raised by the parents on appeal. In re J.P., No. 19-1633, 2020 WL…

In re Z.M.

"However, if a parent does not challenge a step in our analysis, we need not address it." In re J.P. , No.…