From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Initial Public Offering Secuities Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 9, 2004
21 MC 92 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2004)

Opinion

21 MC 92 (SAS)

January 9, 2004

Melvyn I. Weiss, Esq. Robert Wallner, Esq. Ariana J. Tadler, Esq., Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes Lerach LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs

Stanley Bernstein, Esq., Robert Berg, Esq., Rebecca Katz, Esq. Bernstein Liebhard Lifshitz, LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs

Gandolfo V. DiBlasi, Esq., Sullivan Cromwell, New York, NY, for Defendants (Underwriters)

Robert B. McCaw, Esq., Wilmer, Cutler Pickering, New York, NY, for Defendants (Underwriters)

Jack C. Auspitz, Esq., Morrison Foerster LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants (Issuers)


AMENDMENT OPINION


The Opinion and Order of this Court in the above-entitled action, dated December 24, 2003, is hereby amended as follows:

1. On page 7, line 5, replace the sentence "Neither of these contentions are correct" with the sentence "Neither of these contentions is correct."
2. On page 18, line 2, the heading is misnumbered, Replace "IV" with III".

An amended copy of the Opinion and Order is attached.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Initial Public Offering Secuities Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 9, 2004
21 MC 92 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2004)
Case details for

In re Initial Public Offering Secuities Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re: Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation This Document Relates…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 9, 2004

Citations

21 MC 92 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2004)