From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ingram

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Sep 9, 2020
S262995 (Cal. Sep. 9, 2020)

Opinion

S262995

09-09-2020

INGRAM (CURTIS CLIFFORD) ON H.C.


The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely]; In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive].) Individual claims are denied, as applicable. (See In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d 756, 759 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that could have been, but were not, raised on appeal]; In re Lindley (1947) 29 Cal.2d 709, 723 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that attack the sufficiency of the evidence]; In re Miller (1941) 17 Cal.2d 734, 735 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are repetitive].)


Summaries of

In re Ingram

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Sep 9, 2020
S262995 (Cal. Sep. 9, 2020)
Case details for

In re Ingram

Case Details

Full title:INGRAM (CURTIS CLIFFORD) ON H.C.

Court:California Supreme Court (Minute Order)

Date published: Sep 9, 2020

Citations

S262995 (Cal. Sep. 9, 2020)