From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Infinity Headwear & Apparel, LLC

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 17, 2019
2018-1998 (Fed. Cir. May. 17, 2019)

Opinion

2018-1998

05-17-2019

IN RE: INFINITY HEADWEAR & APPAREL, LLC, Appellant

BRIAN TUCKER, Kirton McConkie, Salt Lake City, UT, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES T. BURTON. MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, MAI-TRANG DUC DANG.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/013,508.

JUDGMENT

BRIAN TUCKER, Kirton McConkie, Salt Lake City, UT, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES T. BURTON. MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, MAI-TRANG DUC DANG. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (CHEN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 17, 2019

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Infinity Headwear & Apparel, LLC

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 17, 2019
2018-1998 (Fed. Cir. May. 17, 2019)
Case details for

In re Infinity Headwear & Apparel, LLC

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: INFINITY HEADWEAR & APPAREL, LLC, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 17, 2019

Citations

2018-1998 (Fed. Cir. May. 17, 2019)