From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Guardianship of Fulbright

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 18, 2016
NO. 02-16-00230-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 18, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 02-16-00230-CV

08-18-2016

IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF DOLLIE MAE FULBRIGHT, AN ALLEGED INCAPACITATED PERSON


FROM PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 2014-GD00382-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

In this appeal, Appellant Judy Kay Fulbright attempts to appeal the trial court's March 13, 2015 order appointing a temporary guardian and July 6, 2015 order appointing permanent guardians of the person and estate of Dollie Mae Fulbright. The notice of appeal from the July 6, 2015 order was due August 5, 2015. But Appellant did not file her notice of appeal until July 1, 2016, almost eleven months too late.

See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1.

We notified Appellant that her complaint about the temporary guardianship appears moot; we also notified her of our concern that we lack jurisdiction because of the untimely-filed notice of appeal. We warned Appellant that this appeal could be dismissed for want of jurisdiction absent a response showing that we have jurisdiction. Appellant filed a response, but it does not demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction.

SeeIn re Guardianship of Berry, 105 S.W.3d 665, 666 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2003, no pet.) (stating appointment of temporary guardian becomes moot when permanent guardian appointed).

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

A complaint about a temporary guardianship becomes moot when a permanent guardian is appointed. Further, the time for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional in this court, and absent a timely-filed notice of appeal or timely-filed motion for extension, we must dismiss the appeal. Because Appellant's complaint about the temporary guardianship is moot and the notice of appeal was filed too late, we dismiss Appellant's pending motions and this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Inre Guardianship of Phillips, No. 01-14-01004-CV, 2016 WL 3391249, at *3 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 16, 2016, no pet. h.) (mem. op.); see Berry, 105 S.W.3d at 666.

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b), 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997).

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). --------

PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. DELIVERED: August 18, 2016


Summaries of

In re Guardianship of Fulbright

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 18, 2016
NO. 02-16-00230-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 18, 2016)
Case details for

In re Guardianship of Fulbright

Case Details

Full title:IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF DOLLIE MAE FULBRIGHT, AN ALLEGED INCAPACITATED…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Aug 18, 2016

Citations

NO. 02-16-00230-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 18, 2016)

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. Estrada

"[T]he time for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional in this court, and absent a timely-filed notice…

Manning v. Funimation

(mem. op.) (quoting In re Guardianship of Fulbright, No. 02-16-00230-CV, 2016 WL 4395804, at *1…