From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Dixon

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
Feb 29, 2016
NO. 12-15-00080-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 29, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 12-15-00080-CV

02-29-2016

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF EDSEL A. DIXON AND HEATHER D. DIXON, AND IN THE INTEREST OF ASHLEY LYNN DIXON, A CHILD


APPEAL FROM THE 354TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT RAINS COUNTY, TEXASMEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). Appellant perfected his appeal on March 25, 2015, and the clerk's record was filed on May 5, 2015. On June 24, 2015, the appeal was ordered submitted on the clerk's record alone, making Appellant's brief due on July 24, 2015.

Appellant was notified on August 11, 2015, that his brief was due on July 24, 2015, and that neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time had been filed with the court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8. Additionally, Appellant was warned that the appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if a motion for extension of time was not filed on or before August 21, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was also notified that the motion must contain a reasonable explanation for his failure to file the brief and a showing that Appellee has not suffered material injury thereby. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1).

The August 21, 2015 deadline has passed, and Appellant has not complied with this court's notice. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Opinion delivered February 29, 2016.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)

JUDGMENT

Appeal from the 354th District Court of Rains County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 9544)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.


Summaries of

In re Dixon

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
Feb 29, 2016
NO. 12-15-00080-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 29, 2016)
Case details for

In re Dixon

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF EDSEL A. DIXON AND HEATHER D. DIXON, AND…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

Date published: Feb 29, 2016

Citations

NO. 12-15-00080-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 29, 2016)