From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Immanuel C.-S.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 28, 2013
104 A.D.3d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-03-28

In re IMMANUEL C.-S., A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Debra C., Respondent–Appellant, Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.

Patricia W. Jellen, Eastchester, for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Deborah A. Brenner of counsel), for respondent.



Patricia W. Jellen, Eastchester, for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Deborah A. Brenner of counsel), for respondent.
Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Claire V. Merkine of counsel), attorney for the child.

TOM, J.P., ACOSTA, SAXE, FREEDMAN, FEINMAN, JJ.

Order, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about March 28, 2012, which, after a fact-finding hearing, determined that appellant mother had neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly determined that petitioner proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the mother had neglected the child by reason of her untreated mental condition and failure to provide adequate supervision and guardianship, which placed the child at imminent risk of becoming impaired ( see Matter of Faith J., 47 A.D.3d 630, 848 N.Y.S.2d 545 [2d Dept. 2008]; Matter of Caress S., 250 A.D.2d 490, 673 N.Y.S.2d 123 [1st Dept. 1998]] ). The hospital records and caseworker's testimony indicate that the mother suffers from paranoid ideation and delusions, evidenced by her belief that people were entering her apartment and her car, putting spoiled food in her refrigerator, and listening to her phone conversations. The caseworker also testified that the home was in deplorable condition, which the mother attributed to the lack of closet space, and that the child had not seen a doctor or dentist in several years. In addition, the court observed that the mother's testimony was unfocused. Petitioner was not obligated to prove that the child suffered past or present harm, since the evidence demonstrated that he was at risk of harm based on demonstrable conduct by the mother ( see Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs. v. Denise J., 87 N.Y.2d 73, 79, 637 N.Y.S.2d 666, 661 N.E.2d 138 [1995] ).


Summaries of

In re Immanuel C.-S.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 28, 2013
104 A.D.3d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

In re Immanuel C.-S.

Case Details

Full title:In re IMMANUEL C.-S., A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Debra…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 28, 2013

Citations

104 A.D.3d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
104 A.D.3d 615
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2147

Citing Cases

Yamara R. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. (In re Yamailiz G.)

Order of fact-finding and disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (David J. Kaplan, J.), entered on or about…

Tiffany S. v. Admin. for Child. Serv. (In re C.B.)

Appeal from fact-finding order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the…