From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re I.D.

California Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Mar 17, 2011
No. F060608 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 17, 2011)

Opinion


In re I.D., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. TULARE COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. R.C., Defendant and Appellant. F060608 California Court of Appeal, Fifth District March 17, 2011

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Received for posting 3/3/11

Super. Ct. No. JJV063865.

ORDER DENYING REHEARING AND MODIFYING

Levy, Acting P.J.

BY THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on March 2, 2011, be modified as follows:

1. At the end of the last paragraph on page 10 before “DISPOSITION, ” the following paragraph is added:

Mother also claims a review of the notice the agency sent to the Indian tribes and the responses it received would have revealed other alleged defects. However, mother makes her claims based on evidence in the record and before the juvenile court at the 2009 dispositional hearing when it found for a second time that there was insufficient reason to believe the child was or might be an Indian child covered by ICWA. Having not appealed the juvenile court’s dispositional findings and orders, mother has forfeited those alleged defects under In re Pedro N., supra, 35 Cal.App.4th at p. 185.

Except for the modifications set forth, the opinion previously filed remains unchanged. This modification does not effect a change in judgment.

Appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied.

WE CONCUR: Cornell, J., Kane, J.


Summaries of

In re I.D.

California Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Mar 17, 2011
No. F060608 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 17, 2011)
Case details for

In re I.D.

Case Details

Full title:In re I.D., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. TULARE COUNTY…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 17, 2011

Citations

No. F060608 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 17, 2011)