From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ibrahim

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Aug 1, 2017
230 N.J. 216 (N.J. 2017)

Opinion

08-01-2017

In the MATTER OF Ihab Awad IBRAHIM, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 045112013)


ORDER

This matter have been duly presented pursuant to Rule 1:20–10(b), following a granting of a motion for discipline by consent (DRB 17–191) of IHAB AWAD IBRAHIM of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2013;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard client funds and negligent misappropriation of client funds) and RPC 1.15(d) (failure to comply with the recordkeeping requirements set forth in R. 1:21–6);

And the parties having agreed that respondent's conduct violated RPC 1.15(a) and RPC 1.15(d), and that said conduct warrants a reprimand or lesser discipline;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent's unethical conduct and having granted the motion for discipline by consent in District Docket No, XIV–2015–0466E;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further determined that respondent should be required to submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics, on a quarterly basis, monthly reconciliations of his attorney accounts for two years and until further Order of the Court;And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with Rule 1:20–16(e);

And good cause appearing;It is ORDERED that IHAB AWAD IBRAHIM of JERSEY CITY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics, on a quarterly basis, monthly reconciliations of his attorney accounts for a period of two years and until further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Ibrahim

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Aug 1, 2017
230 N.J. 216 (N.J. 2017)
Case details for

In re Ibrahim

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Ihab Awad IBRAHIM, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Aug 1, 2017

Citations

230 N.J. 216 (N.J. 2017)
165 A.3d 811

Citing Cases

In re Ibrahim

In 2017, respondent was reprimanded for negligent misappropriation of client funds and recordkeeping…

In re Ibrahim

He currently is a sole practitioner, with his primary office in Jersey City, New Jersey. On August 1, 2017,…