Although imposition of R.C. 2152.83(B) registration requirements may be punitive, they may help achieve the goal of rehabilitation by motivating the juvenile to comply with treatment in order to reduce or eliminate the registration requirement. In Re I.A, 2nd Dist. Montgomery No. 25078, 2012 Ohio 4973.Accordingly, D.R. has failed to show that a JOR classification that extends beyond a child's twenty-first birthday violates either the United States or Ohio constitutional prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment or the requirements of due process.

Although imposition of R.C. 2152.83(B) registration requirements may be punitive, they may help achieve the goal of rehabilitation by motivating the juvenile to comply with treatment in order to reduce or eliminate the registration requirement. In Re I.A, 2nd Dist. Montgomery No. 25078, 2012 Ohio 4973.Accordingly, D.R. has failed to show that a JOR classification that extends beyond a child's twenty-first birthday violates either the United States or Ohio constitutional prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment or the requirements of due process.

Although imposition of R.C. 2152.83(B) registration requirements may be punitive, they may help achieve the goal of rehabilitation by motivating the juvenile to comply with treatment in order to reduce or eliminate the registration requirement. In Re I.A, 2nd Dist. Montgomery No. 25078, 2012 Ohio 4973. {¶63} "Accordingly, D.R. has failed to show that a JOR classification that extends beyond a child's twenty-first birthday violates either the United States or Ohio constitutional prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment or the requirements of due process.