From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hussell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 13, 2020
No. 20-1124 (4th Cir. Mar. 13, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-1124

03-13-2020

In re: JOSEPH HUSSELL; A.H., Petitioners.

Joseph Hussell; A.H., Petitioners Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:19-cv-00101) Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Hussell; A.H., Petitioners Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph Hussell, on behalf of himself and a minor, A.H., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the magistrate judge assigned to Hussell's case entered his proposed findings and recommendation regarding Hussell's petition for habeas corpus on February 14, 2020. Accordingly, because the district court has acted in Hussell's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Hussell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 13, 2020
No. 20-1124 (4th Cir. Mar. 13, 2020)
Case details for

In re Hussell

Case Details

Full title:In re: JOSEPH HUSSELL; A.H., Petitioners.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 13, 2020

Citations

No. 20-1124 (4th Cir. Mar. 13, 2020)