From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hursey

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Aug 11, 2006
634 S.E.2d 642 (S.C. 2006)

Opinion

August 11, 2006.


ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and seeking the appointment of an attorney to protect respondent's clients' interests pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent has filed a return in which he consents to being placed on interim suspension and reports having made arrangements to protect the interests of his clients without the necessity of appointing an attorney to protect. In response to the return, ODC withdraws its request for the appointment an attorney to protect respondent's clients' interests at the present time.

Pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, respondent's license to practice law in this state is hereby suspended until further order of the Court. Should it determine that it is in the best interests of respondent's clients or others to appoint an attorney to protect, ODC may file a petition seeking appointment of an attorney to protect pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Costa M. Pleicones, A.C.J.

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

In re Hursey

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Aug 11, 2006
634 S.E.2d 642 (S.C. 2006)
Case details for

In re Hursey

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michael T. HURSEY, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Aug 11, 2006

Citations

634 S.E.2d 642 (S.C. 2006)
634 S.E.2d 642

Citing Cases

In re Hursey

On August 11, 2006, he was placed on Interim Suspension by order of this Court. In re Hursey, 370 S.C. 41,…

In Matter of Michael T. Hursey

By order dated August 11, 2006, respondent was placed on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE,…