In re Application of Hunter

2 Citing cases

  1. In re Application of Hunter

    50 Cal.App. 803 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920)

    Writ discharged and petitioner remanded. The facts are identical with those in In re Hunter, ante, p. 285, [ 195 P. 76]. King King for Petitioner.

  2. In re Rosella McDermott

    77 Cal.App. 109 (Cal. Ct. App. 1926)   Cited 4 times

    [1] The order of the court by which petitioner was made a ward of the juvenile court of necessity had the effect of transferring the matter of her guardianship from her parents to the court itself, and it thereupon became discretionary with the court whether to permit the minor to return to the home of her parents or to place her within the care and custody of some state institution. ( In re Hunter, 50 Cal.App. 285 [ 195 P. 76].) Although the actual physical care of the minor was in the parents, the ward was rightfully under the final control of the court, rather than under the control of her parents.