From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hunt

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 30, 2015
599 F. App'x 693 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

Submitted March 10, 2015

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 32.1)

Appeal from the United States District Courtfor the Central District of California. Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, Presiding.

PELI POPOVICH HUNT, Appellant, Pro se, Beverly Hills, CA.

For DAVID M. GOODRICH, Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of Robert W. Hunt, MD a medical corporation, Appellee: David Gould, Esquire, Gould & Gould LLP, Calabasas, CA.


Before: FARRIS, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Peli Popovich Hunt, individually and as trustee of the Robert and Peli Hunt Living Trust, appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court's order granting a preliminary injunction to Chapter 7 trustee David M. Goodrich. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158. We review de novo whether a case is moot, Demery v. Arpaio, 378 F.3d 1020, 1025 (9th Cir. 2004), and we dismiss.

This appeal is moot because the bankruptcy court has entered final judgment, which Hunt has not appealed. See Church of Scientology of Cal. v. United States, 506 U.S. 9, 12, 113 S.Ct. 447, 121 L.Ed.2d 313 (1992) (appeal must be dismissed for mootness if it is impossible for the appellate court to grant any effectual relief to the prevailing party); Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. Madigan, 954 F.2d 1441, 1450 (9th Cir. 1992) (when underlying claims have been decided, the reversal of a preliminary injunction would have no practical effect, and is moot).

Goodrich's request for judicial notice, filed August 19, 2014, is granted.

Hunt's motion to supplement the record and request for judicial notice, filed June 12, 2014, and her motion to redact the July 25, 2014 Proof of Service and second request for judicial notice, filed August 11, 2014, are denied.

Appellant's motion to recall the mandate, filed November 15, 2014, is denied.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

In re Hunt

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 30, 2015
599 F. App'x 693 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

In re Hunt

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of: ROBERT W. HUNT, M.D., A Medical Corporation, Debtor, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 30, 2015

Citations

599 F. App'x 693 (9th Cir. 2015)