From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hull

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Jan 23, 2023
No. 361538 (Mich. Ct. App. Jan. 23, 2023)

Opinion

361538

01-23-2023

In re T M Hull Minor


LC No. 16-000081-NA

Kathleen Jansen Presiding Judge James Robert Redford Christopher P. Yates Judges

ORDER

The motion to allow law student Sarah M. L. Bender to represent appellee, at oral argument in this case, MCR 8.120(D)(3), is GRANTED. Attorney Vivek S. Sankaran (P-68538) shall accompany Sarah M. L. Bender in the courtroom pursuant to MCR 8.120(D)(2)(b)(i), and shall be prepared to present the argument in the event the Court determines that the representation by Sarah M. L. Bender is professionally inadequate and substantial justice requires suspension of argument by Sarah M. L. Bender pursuant to MCR 8.120(D)(3).


Summaries of

In re Hull

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Jan 23, 2023
No. 361538 (Mich. Ct. App. Jan. 23, 2023)
Case details for

In re Hull

Case Details

Full title:In re T M Hull Minor

Court:Court of Appeals of Michigan

Date published: Jan 23, 2023

Citations

No. 361538 (Mich. Ct. App. Jan. 23, 2023)