From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Huling

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jun 8, 1910
109 P. 576 (Okla. Crim. App. 1910)

Opinion

No. A-723.

Opinion Filed June 8, 1910.

Application of A.H. Huling for writ of mandamus. Writ discharged, and petitioner remanded.

J.T. Shive and Henry Bulow, for petitioner.

W.C. Austin and Shartel, Keaton Wells for respondent.


The facts in this case are in all respects identical with those in case No. A-724, In re W.C. Jones, infra, 109 P. 570. This petitioner was convicted for violating the same ordinance of the town of Eldorado which Jones was charged with violating; and he makes identically the same contention made by Jones. The decision in that case is controlling in this case.

The writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued in this case will therefore be discharged, and the petitioner remanded to the custody of the town marshal of Eldorado. It is so ordered.


Summaries of

In re Huling

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jun 8, 1910
109 P. 576 (Okla. Crim. App. 1910)
Case details for

In re Huling

Case Details

Full title:In re A.H. HULING

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 8, 1910

Citations

109 P. 576 (Okla. Crim. App. 1910)
109 P. 576

Citing Cases

Saint v. Saint

"Equity will not countenance stale claims, and after the lapse of so long a time (14 years) will strictly…