From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Howell

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 16, 2005
Bankruptcy No. 05-12655, Document No. 9 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Dec. 16, 2005)

Opinion

Bankruptcy No. 05-12655, Document No. 9.

December 16, 2005


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Before the Court is the Trustee's Objection to Exemptions. The Trustee asserts that the Debtors' claim of exemption under § 522(d)(3) in a shotgun, rifle and 3 horses is inappropriate and that the Debtors must use § 522(d)(5) for those items leaving a reduced amount of the (d)(5) "wildcard" exemption available for the Debtor-wife's Individual Retirement Account ("IRA"). The Trustee also asserts that the Debtors' claim of exemption under § 522(d)(10)(E) in the IRA is not appropriate since the Debtor remains employed, the IRA is not in pay status, and the IRA is not reasonably necessary for support of the Debtors.

Debtors have not filed a Response to the Trustee's objection other than to file an Amended Schedule C which does not resolve the issues.

A horse can qualify for exemption under § 522(d)(3) if "held primarily for . . . personal, family or household use." 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(3). In re Gallegos, 226 BR 111 (Bankr. D ID 1998) (horse is exempt as household pet); In re Cass, 104 BR 382, 385 (Bankr. ND OK 1989) (horses used only incidentally as pets or riding animals are not held primarily for personal, family or household use, and are not exempt).

From the record before us, we are unable to determine the Debtors' primary use of the horses. We note that Debtors' Schedule J reflects monthly expenses of $200 for the horses an additional $50 for dogs. Elimination of those expenses would permit the Debtors to fund a dividend of $15,000 to unsecured creditors in a Chapter 13 Plan. Accordingly, a question arises under § 707(b) whether the granting of relief would be a substantial abuse of the provisions of the Bankruptcy code.

Likewise, although it appears that the IRA cannot be claimed as exempt under § 522(d)(10)(E), the Debtors have yet to concede the issue.

It is therefore ORDERED as follows:

1. Debtors shall file an Answer to the Trustee's Objection to Exemptions within 20 days.

2. An evidentiary hearing to consider the Trustee's Objection to Exemptions and to consider whether the case should be dismissed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 707(b) is fixed for February 7, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. in the U.S. Courthouse, Bankruptcy Courtroom, 17 South Park Row, Erie, PA. The entire morning is reserved on the Court's calendar.


Summaries of

In re Howell

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 16, 2005
Bankruptcy No. 05-12655, Document No. 9 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Dec. 16, 2005)
Case details for

In re Howell

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DANIEL J. HOWELL AND LINDA L. HOWELL, Chapter 7, Debtors. RICHARD W…

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 16, 2005

Citations

Bankruptcy No. 05-12655, Document No. 9 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Dec. 16, 2005)