From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Howard

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 13, 2014
583 F. App'x 914 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Opinion

2014-1137

11-13-2014

IN RE MAUREEN A. HOWARD

ROBERT R. AXENFELD, O'Kelly Ernst & Bielli, LLC, of Wilmington, Delaware, argued for appellant. MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and FRANCES M. LYNCH, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel was JEREMIAH HELM, Associate Solicitor.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 11/209,266.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT R. AXENFELD, O'Kelly Ernst & Bielli, LLC, of Wilmington, Delaware, argued for appellant. MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and FRANCES M. LYNCH, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel was JEREMIAH HELM, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (TARANTO, BRYSON, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 13, 2014

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Howard

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 13, 2014
583 F. App'x 914 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Case details for

In re Howard

Case Details

Full title:IN RE HOWARD

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 13, 2014

Citations

583 F. App'x 914 (Fed. Cir. 2014)