Opinion
NUMBER 13-18-00296-CV
03-06-2019
IN RE COLONEL CLIFTON HOSKINS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF HAZEL HOSKINS
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria
Order Per Curiam
Currently before the Court is a motion for rehearing filed by real parties in interest, Lee Roy Hoskins Jr.; Lee Ann Hoskins Kulka; Andrea Clare Jurica; and Lee Roy "Tito" Hoskins III ("the Hoskins Real Parties"). The motion for rehearing assails this Court's decision to conditionally grant mandamus relief in favor of relator, Colonel Clifton Hoskins, individually and as independent executor of the estate of Hazel Hoskins. See In re Hoskins, No. 13-18-00296-CV, 2018 WL 6815486, at *1 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Dec. 27, 2018, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). By order previously imposed in this case on January 17, 2019, this Court granted the real parties' Unopposed Motion for a Stay of this Court's Order and Trial Proceedings Pending Rehearing of Mandamus Petition. We stayed our order granting mandamus relief and requiring action by the respondent, and we similarly stayed all trial court proceedings, including discovery, pending further order of this Court or the resolution of the real parties' motion for rehearing. We further granted the real parties an extension of time to file their motion for rehearing.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for rehearing, is of the opinion that it should be denied. Accordingly, we lift the stay previously imposed by this Court on January 17, 2019, and we deny the motion for rehearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 6th day of March, 2019.