From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Holup

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department
Mar 3, 2022
203 A.D.3d 1303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

PM–45–22

03-03-2022

In the MATTER OF Robert Nicholas HOLUP, a Resigned Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 5587480)

Robert Nicholas Holup, Maplewood, New Jersey, respondent pro se. Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.


Robert Nicholas Holup, Maplewood, New Jersey, respondent pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: Garry, P.J., Clark, Aarons, Pritzker and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION

Per Curiam.

Robert Nicholas Holup was admitted to practice by this Court in January 2018. In July 2017, Holup was admitted to practice in the state of New Jersey, where he remains an attorney in good standing. Thereafter, in August 2020, Holup applied for leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons, citing his admission in other jurisdictions and the lack of any necessity to maintain his New York law license as a condition of employment with his former employer. This Court granted Holup's application and removed his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in November 2020 ( 188 A.D.3d 1552, 132 N.Y.S.3d 894 [2020] ). Holup now applies for his reinstatement (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 ), and the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department advises that it does not oppose his application.

Holup was also previously admitted in the District of Columbia, but resigned from the practice of law in that jurisdiction in September 2020.

An applicant seeking reinstatement from nondisciplinary resignation must "establish both the requisite legal education or experience and the necessary character and fitness as would be required of an applicant for admission in the first instance" ( Matter of Weiss, 166 A.D.3d 1159, 1160, 86 N.Y.S.3d 327 [2018] ; see Matter of Gaudioso, 159 A.D.3d 1217, 1218, 70 N.Y.S.3d 93 [2018] ). In making our determination, we have wide discretion to either grant the application, with or without any conditions deemed appropriate, or to deny the application with leave to renew upon the completion of the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination, additional continuing legal education or even the New York Bar Examination (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b]; see generally Matter of Tuve, 171 A.D.3d 1392, 1393, 98 N.Y.S.3d 355 [2019] ).

Holup has properly submitted his application for reinstatement from nondisciplinary resignation in the form provided in appendix F to the Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters (22 NYCRR) part 1240 (see Rules of App.Div., 3d Dept. [ 22 NYCRR] § 806.22 [b]). In doing so, Holup attests that, since the date of our order granting his resignation, he has no criminal history and has not been subjected to any discipline in any jurisdiction in which he is admitted. To this end, Holup provides proof that he is presently in good standing in New Jersey, his home jurisdiction. Further, Holup attests that he does not suffer from any condition or impairment affecting his ability to practice law. Finally, Holup provides proof of his compliance with the continuing legal education requirements of his home jurisdiction, which would in turn satisfy his requirements in this state (see Rules of App.Div., All Depts [ 22 NYCRR] § 1500.5 [b][1]; § 1500.22[n][1]). Accordingly, we find that Holup "has the requisite legal training and experience, as well as the necessary character and fitness, to justify his reinstatement" ( Matter of Weiss, 166 A.D.3d at 1160, 86 N.Y.S.3d 327 ), and we therefore grant his application for reinstatement and restore his name to the roll of attorneys in this state, effective immediately.

Garry, P.J., Clark, Aarons, Pritzker and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that Robert Nicholas Holup's application for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that Robert Nicholas Holup's name is hereby restored to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that Robert Nicholas Holup shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, file an attorney registration statement with the Chief Administrator of the Courts pursuant to Judiciary Law § 468–a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1.


Summaries of

In re Holup

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department
Mar 3, 2022
203 A.D.3d 1303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

In re Holup

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Robert Nicholas Holup, a Resigned Attorney. (Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department

Date published: Mar 3, 2022

Citations

203 A.D.3d 1303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
203 A.D.3d 1303

Citing Cases

In re Saul

While an applicant seeking reinstatement following nondisciplinary resignation was previously not required to…

In re O'Neill

On the topic of O'Neill’s character and fitness, we note that she has no criminal or disciplinary history…