From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hollander

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
May 8, 1985
50 B.R. 15 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1985)

Opinion


50 B.R. 15 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Fla. 1985) In re Neil Harrison HOLLANDER, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 84-02401-BKC-TCB. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. May 8, 1985

        Michael Ullman, North Miami Beach, Fla., for debtor.

        THOMAS C. BRITTON, Bankruptcy Judge.

        ORDER DENYING CONTINUANCE

        The chapter 11 debtor's motion for continuance filed May 2 is denied. It is not essential that the debtor appear in person on May 23. He may appear through counsel.

        The debtor has also questioned this court's discretion to order the debtor to show cause on May 23 why no plan has been filed in this case. This case will then have been pending over five months. A chapter 11 debtor is required to perform all the functions and duties of a trustee. 11 U.S.C. § 1107(a). A chapter 11 trustee is, therefore, required to:

"as soon as practicable, file a plan under § 1121 of this title, file a report of why the trustee will not file a plan, or recommend conversion of the case to a case under chapter 7 or 13 of this title or dismissal of the case." § 1106(a)(5).

        It appears that this debtor has failed to perform that duty. This court has authority to issue any order, process or judgment necessary or appropriate to enforce performance of that duty. § 105(a).

        This motion has been denied without a hearing because movant's counsel has specifically requested an ex parte ruling.


Summaries of

In re Hollander

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
May 8, 1985
50 B.R. 15 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1985)
Case details for

In re Hollander

Case Details

Full title:In re Neil Harrison HOLLANDER, Debtors.

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Date published: May 8, 1985

Citations

50 B.R. 15 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1985)

Citing Cases

In re Relativity Fashion, LLC

Layo, 460 F.3d at 292 (quoting In re Howe, 913 F.2d 1138, 1146 n. 28 (5th Cir. 1990)). If a party had…