From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Holland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 30, 2008
283 F. App'x 161 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-1475.

Submitted: June 26, 2008.

Decided: June 30, 2008.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:94-cr-00027-RLV-1).

William Ernest Holland, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.


Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


William Ernest Holland petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for reduction of sentence. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.


Summaries of

In re Holland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 30, 2008
283 F. App'x 161 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

In re Holland

Case Details

Full title:In re: William Ernest HOLLAND, Petitioner

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 30, 2008

Citations

283 F. App'x 161 (4th Cir. 2008)