In re Hamilton, 892 F.2d 1230 (5th Cir. 1990); In re Holloway, 132 B.R. 771 (Bankr.N.D.Okla. 1991); In re Holder, 94 B.R. 395 (Bankr.M.D.N.C. 1988); In re Scoviac, 74 B.R. 635 (Bankr.N.D.Fla. 1987); In re Murray, 27 B.R. 445 (Bankr.M.D.Tenn. 1984).
See also In re Walker, 161 B.R. 484, 501 (Bankr.D. Idaho 1993), aff'd, 178 B.R. 497 (D.Idaho 1994); In re Holloway, 132 B.R. 771, 773 (Bankr.N.D.Okla. 1991); In re Holder, 94 B.R. 395, 398 (Bankr.M.D.N.C. 1988), aff'd, 94 B.R. 394 (M.D.N.C. 1988), aff'd, 892 F.2d 29 (4th Cir. 1989) (issue of applicability of state law relation-back period not appealed to the circuit court); In re Scoviac, 74 B.R. 635, 637-38 (Bankr.N.D.Fla. 1987); In re Murray, 27 B.R. 445, 451 (Bankr.M.D.Tenn. 1983).