From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Holborow

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 9, 1972
30 N.Y.2d 868 (N.Y. 1972)

Opinion

Argued May 30, 1972

Decided June 9, 1972

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department.

John A. Murray, Helen R. Cassidy and John G. de Roos for appellant-respondent.

Frank R. McGlynn for respondent-appellant.



On appeal by the Transit Authority: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and GIBSON.

Judges BREITEL and JASEN dissent and vote to modify in the following memorandum: We dissent and vote to modify and reinstate the determination on the ground that there was substantial evidence to sustain the determination and if believed, as it was, established the unfitness in character and conduct of petitioner to remain a transit police officer, a position of extreme sensitivity.

On appeal by the petitioner: Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the dissent at the Appellate Division is not on a stated question of law in favor of petitioner and he is not aggrieved by the modification at the Appellate Division (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], pars. [i], [iii]).


Summaries of

In re Holborow

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 9, 1972
30 N.Y.2d 868 (N.Y. 1972)
Case details for

In re Holborow

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WALTER HOLBOROW, Respondent-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 9, 1972

Citations

30 N.Y.2d 868 (N.Y. 1972)
335 N.Y.S.2d 301
286 N.E.2d 736