From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re H.N.M.

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
May 24, 2012
NO. 09-12-00059-CV (Tex. App. May. 24, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 09-12-00059-CV

05-24-2012

IN THE INTEREST OF H.N.M.


On Appeal from the 418th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 09-01-00464-CV


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 5, 2012, the parties were notified that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why additional time was needed to file the record. The appellant did not respond to the Court's notice. The appellant did not file an affidavit of indigence and is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Costs are assessed against the appellant.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

DAVID GAULTNEY

Justice
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

In re H.N.M.

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
May 24, 2012
NO. 09-12-00059-CV (Tex. App. May. 24, 2012)
Case details for

In re H.N.M.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF H.N.M.

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: May 24, 2012

Citations

NO. 09-12-00059-CV (Tex. App. May. 24, 2012)