In re H.M.S.

Full title: Re: In the interest of H.M.S., a child

Court: Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

No. 05-10-00061-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 19, 2012)

Opinion

05-10-00061-CV

01-19-2012

Re: In the interest of H.M.S., a child

Carolyn Wright

Chief Justice

Justices

Joseph B. Morris

Jim Moseley

David L. Bridges

Michael J. O'Neill

Kerry P. FitzGerald

Martin Richter

Molly Francis

Douglas S. Lang

Elizabeth Lang-Miers

Mary Murphy

Robert M. Fillmore

Lana Myers

Lisa Matz

clerk of the court

Gayle Humpa

business administrator

Cary Schulman

The Cary Schulman Law Firm

Robert Davis

Matthews, Stein, Shiels, Pearce, Knott, Eden

Robert Matlock

Woods, May & Matlock, P.C.
Dear Attorneys:

Enclosed is a corrected page for the above-referenced case. Please note the following typographical error which has been corrected:

pg. 2, section II., citation correction, last two sentences now read:

Although there are four classes of witnesses that are exempt from the operation of the rule, "officers of the court" are not among those exempted. See Tex. R. Evid. 614. Accordingly, Judge Khoury erred in refusing to exclude certain witnesses on the basis that they were court employees. Please replace your previous copy with the enclosed.

Sincerely,

Lisa Matz

Clerk of the Court

cc:

Trial court judge

Trial court clerk