From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hillis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Oct 28, 2011
2011-1401 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

2011-1401 Serial No. 11/386,211

10-28-2011

IN RE W. DANIEL HILLIS, RODERICK A. HYDE, NATHAN P. MYHRVOLD, CLARENCE T. TEGREENE, AND LOWELL L. WOOD, JR.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.


Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.


ON MOTION


ORDER

The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office moves for an 18-day extension of time, until November 22, 2011, for the Director to file his response brief, and for a 20-day extension of time, until December 29, 2011, for the appellants to file their reply brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. No further extensions should be anticipated by the Director.

FOR THE COURT

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Manu J. Tejwani, Esq.

Raymond T. Chen, Esq.

s21


Summaries of

In re Hillis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Oct 28, 2011
2011-1401 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

In re Hillis

Case Details

Full title:IN RE W. DANIEL HILLIS, RODERICK A. HYDE, NATHAN P. MYHRVOLD, CLARENCE T…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

2011-1401 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 28, 2011)