From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hillcrest Foods, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine
Apr 2, 1981
10 B.R. 579 (Bankr. D. Me. 1981)

Opinion

Bankruptcy Nos. 281-00098 to 00101. Adv. No. 281-0040.

April 2, 1981.

Gerald Gillerman, Widett, Slater Goldman, Boston, Mass., Gerald S. Cope, Portland, Me., for debtors.

Peter B. Bickerman, William C. Nugent, Asst. Attys. Gen., Augusta, Me., for defendant.


ORDER REINSTATING SELF-INSURERS STATUS OF DEBTORS


This matter, after notice, came on for a preliminary hearing on March 25, 1981. Counsel for both parties were present. After hearing evidence from William Bott, financial consultant to the Debtors, and Robert Flynn, consultant to the Debtors in respect to Workers' Compensation insurance, and after hearing the arguments of counsel, the Court finds that the Department of Business Regulation, Bureau of Insurance of the State of Maine, by Theodore T. Briggs, Superintendent, addressed a letter to Hillcrest Foods, Inc. purporting to summarily suspend the Debtors' status as a self-insurer under the Workers' Compensation law. The letter contained the following language:

Under authority of Title 39 M.R.S.A., Section 23(2), I hereby suspend indefinitely the authority of Hillcrest Foods, Inc. to self-insure workers' compensation benefits in this state, for the reason that the filing of a petition for voluntary bankruptcy by Hillcrest Foods, Inc. constitutes failure to satisfactorily establish solvency and financial ability to pay the compensation and benefits required under the Workers' Compensation Act . . . This suspension is effective immediately upon your receipt of the notice. . . .

From the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing, including the letter, which was admitted as an Exhibit, the Court concludes that the summary suspension of the Debtors' status as a self-insurer under the Workers' Compensation Act may be a violation of Section 525 of the Bankruptcy Code [ 11 U.S.C. § 525] which prohibits a governmental unit from discriminating against a debtor solely because a debtor is or has been a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code. It is, therefore,

Section 525 [ 11 U.S.C. § 525] reads in part as follows:

[A] governmental unit may not deny, revoke, suspend, or refuse to renew a license, permit, charter, franchise, or other similar grant to, condition such a grant to, discriminate with respect to such a grant against, . . . a person that is or has been a debtor under this title . . . solely because such bankrupt or debtor is or has been a debtor under this title . . ., has been insolvent before the commencement of the case under this title, or during the case but before the debtor is granted or denied a discharge, or has not paid a debt that is dischargeable in the case under this title. . . .

ORDERED and ADJUDGED

that the summary suspension of the Debtors' status as a self-insurer under the Workers' Compensation Act is void and of no effect and the Debtors are hereby restored to their status as self-insurers under Maine's Workers' Compensation Act pending a full hearing upon the Debtors' complaint which seeks permanent restoration of their status as self-insurers.


Summaries of

In re Hillcrest Foods, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine
Apr 2, 1981
10 B.R. 579 (Bankr. D. Me. 1981)
Case details for

In re Hillcrest Foods, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In re HILLCREST FOODS, INC., Pure 1, Inc., WJM Co., and Mendelson Farms…

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine

Date published: Apr 2, 1981

Citations

10 B.R. 579 (Bankr. D. Me. 1981)

Citing Cases

In re the Bible Speaks

This case is similar to cases where a state has revoked a debtor's worker's compensation self-insurance…

Penobscot Valley Hosp. v. Carranza (In re Penobscot Valley Hosp.)

For example, Rose v. Connecticut Housing Authority (In re Rose), 23 B.R. 662 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1982) contains…