From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 19, 2011
86 A.D.3d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

Nos. 2010-07266, 2010-07267, (Docket No. 01355-09/10).

July 19, 2011.

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Woods, J.), entered July 16, 2010, which granted the mother's petition for modification of an order of visitation and (2) an order of the same court, also entered July 16, 2010, which dismissed the father's petition alleging violations of previous orders of visitation. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California ( 386 US 738) in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute the appeal.

David Rich, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

Susan Argento Ferlauto, Thornwood, N.Y., attorney for the child.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Leventhal, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.


Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant's assigned counsel that, under the circumstances of this case, there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see Anders v California, 386 US 738; Matter of Samantha G. [Luis G], 82 AD3d 885; Matter of Paola, 63 AD3d 743; Matter of Duong v Duong, 51 AD3d 791).


Summaries of

In re Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 19, 2011
86 A.D.3d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Hill

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LORETTA HILL, Respondent, v. DANIEL RAWISZER, SR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 19, 2011

Citations

86 A.D.3d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 6034
926 N.Y.S.2d 913