Opinion
23-1091
03-21-2023
In re: DAVID HILL, a/k/a John Doe, Petitioner.
David Hill, Petitioner Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: March 16, 2023
On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus. (A00-084)
David Hill, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
David Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court clerk to enter on the docket grand jury proceedings that were held in 2000, which led to a subpoena for samples of Hill's saliva and hair. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown, LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and "has no other adequate means to attain the relief [he] desires." Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795 (cleaned up).
The relief sought by Hill is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.