From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hewlett-Packard Co. Shareholder Derivative Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 10, 2015
No. 12-CV-6003-CRB (N.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2015)

Opinion

No. 12-CV-6003-CRB

12-10-2015

IN RE HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.


ORDER ADOPTING THE SPECIAL MASTER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Now before the Court are HP's Motion to Adopt the Special Master's Report and Recommendation on HP's Motion to Seal (dkt. 447) and AJ Copeland's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (dkt. 448). The Court, having considered the papers in support of the Motion, the pleadings and files in this action, and all other matters properly before the Court, being fully advised in the proceedings, and for good cause shown, GRANTS HP's Motion to Adopt the Special Master's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 10, 2015

/s/_________

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

In re Hewlett-Packard Co. Shareholder Derivative Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 10, 2015
No. 12-CV-6003-CRB (N.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2015)
Case details for

In re Hewlett-Packard Co. Shareholder Derivative Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 10, 2015

Citations

No. 12-CV-6003-CRB (N.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2015)

Citing Cases

Coleman v. Brown

Defendants provide no authority suggesting that statutory provisions enacted to protect whistleblowers or…

Coleman v. Brown

Defendants provide no authority suggesting that statutory provisions enacted to protect whistleblowers or…