From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hertz

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 24, 1954
117 N.E.2d 925 (Ohio 1954)

Opinion

No. 33756

Decided February 24, 1954.

Habeas corpus — To obtain release from incarceration — Facts alleged in petition insufficient to warrant relief.

IN HABEAS CORPUS.

Mr. Carl C. Hertz, in propria persona. Mr. C. William O'Neill, attorney general, Mr. Thomas R. Lloyd and Mr. Earl N. Merwin, for respondent.


The petitioner has invoked the original jurisdiction of this court by a proceeding in habeas corpus to obtain his release from incarceration in the Ohio Penitentiary to which he was sentenced after pleading guilty to an indictment charging him with issuing checks with intent to defraud in violation of Section 710-176, General Code. He contends that since he was acting as an officer of a corporation at the time of the issuance of the checks a criminal action could not be maintained against him, and that the indictment did not charge an offense.

The petition contains no allegation of fact which entitles petitioner to the relief sought. The relief prayed for is denied. Giordano v. State, 160 Ohio St. 460.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Hertz

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 24, 1954
117 N.E.2d 925 (Ohio 1954)
Case details for

In re Hertz

Case Details

Full title:IN RE HERTZ

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Feb 24, 1954

Citations

117 N.E.2d 925 (Ohio 1954)
117 N.E.2d 925