Opinion
No. 01-08-00665-CR
Opinion issued December 4, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Panel consists of Justices JENNINGS, HANKS, and BLAND.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Robert Herrera, has filed a pro se post-conviction petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the Executive Director of the Children's Advocacy Center has not provided him with copies of the investigation report and medical report in trial court cause number 824384. We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. This Court has mandamus jurisdiction against a district court judge or county court judge in our district, and all writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (Vernon 2008). Relator's request that this Court order the Executive Director of the Children's Assessment Center to provide him with documents from the Center's investigation files does not fall within our mandamus authority. Therefore, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
In his petition, relator misspells the name of the Executive Director ofthe Harris County Children's Assessment Center, Elaine Stolte.
Attached to relator's petition is a letter from the Harris County Attorney's Office that states in part:
Your letters dated October 23, 2007 to the Children's Assessment Center have been referred to me for a response. You requested copies of the investigation and medical reports (entire files) . . . numbered cause numbers0824383 and 0824284 . . . In accordance with Tex. Fam. Code § 261.201and the Public Information Act § 552.028 (a) (1) those requests must be denied.
We note that relator's petition does not conform to the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. For example, it does not include a designation of parties, a table of contents, or an index of authorities. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.3 (b) (c).