From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Henry & Sons Constr. Co.

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Oct 6, 2014
NUMBER 13-14-00564-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 6, 2014)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-14-00564-CV

10-06-2014

IN RE HENRY & SONS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Relator, Henry & Sons Construction Co., Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief in the above cause on September 25, 2014, seeking to compel the trial court to grant a continuance for the trial of the underlying cause. The Court requested that the real parties in interest, Monica Buitureira, individually and as representative of the estate of Nicholas Antonio Benavides, deceased, and Ricardo Benavides, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the emergency motion for temporary relief. Such response was duly filed. Relator has now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this original proceeding on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle the underlying litigation. Relator requests that we dismiss this petition for writ of mandamus without reference to its merits and assess appellate court costs against the party incurring same.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the unopposed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that it should be granted. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) ("A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings."); State Bar of Tex. v. Gomez, 891 S.W.2d 243, 245 (Tex. 1994) (stating that, for a controversy to be justiciable, there must be a real controversy between the parties that will be actually resolved by the judicial relief sought). Accordingly, we GRANT the unopposed motion to dismiss and we DISMISS this original proceeding as moot without reference to the merits thereof. We likewise DISMISS Relator's emergency motion for temporary relief as moot. Appellate costs will be assessed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 6th day of October, 2014.


Summaries of

In re Henry & Sons Constr. Co.

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Oct 6, 2014
NUMBER 13-14-00564-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 6, 2014)
Case details for

In re Henry & Sons Constr. Co.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE HENRY & SONS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Oct 6, 2014

Citations

NUMBER 13-14-00564-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 6, 2014)