From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Henry

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Dec 1, 2011
NO. 01-11-00998-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 01-11-00998-CR

12-01-2011

IN RE MELVIN G. HENRY, Relator


Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Melvin G. Henry, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b) (Vernon 2004); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the presiding judge of the 221st District Court of Montogomery County to rule on his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc.

A court of appeals has jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus against a "judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district." TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b)(1). Montgomery County is not within our appellate district. See id. § 22.201(b) (Vernon Supp. 2011). Montgomery County is within the Ninth Court of Appeals's district. Id. § 22.201(j). Because Montgomery County is not in our appellate district, we have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus directed at the presiding judge of the 221st District Court.

Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Massengale. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

In re Henry

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Dec 1, 2011
NO. 01-11-00998-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2011)
Case details for

In re Henry

Case Details

Full title:IN RE MELVIN G. HENRY, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Dec 1, 2011

Citations

NO. 01-11-00998-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2011)