From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Heilig-Meyers Company

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division
Aug 26, 2003
Case No. 00-34533 (Bankr. E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 00-34533

August 26, 2003

Bruce H. Matson (Va. Bar No. 22874), Troy Savenko (Va. Bar No. 44516), Katherine Macaulay Mueller (Va. Bar No. 44302), LeCLAIR RYAN, A Professional Corporation, Richmond, Virginia, Counsel for the Debtors

Michael J. Champlin (Va. Bar No. 19024), BOWEN, CHAMPLIN, CARR AND ROCKECHARLIE, Richmond, Virginia, Counsel for NW Palmer, Ltd.


ORDER RESOLVING OBJECTION OF NW PALMER LTD. TO DEBTORS' NINTH MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ASSUME OR REJECT CERTAIN UNEXPIRED LEASES OF NONRESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY


This matter came before the Court upon the motion, dated April 4, 2003 (the "Motion"), of the above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (the "Debtors"), for entry of an order pursuant to section 365(d)(4) of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"), granting an ninth extension of the Debtors' time in which to assume or reject unexpired leases of non-residential real property and upon the objection of United Properties, Inc. (the "United Properties Objection") and the objection of NW Palmer Ltd. (the "NW Palmer Objection"). The Court previously entered an Order on May 1, 2003(i) granting the relief requested with regard to all Unexpired Leases except the United Properties and NW Palmer leases, and (ii) continuing the hearing on the Motion as it related to these Objections. On July 14, 2003, United Properties filed with the Court a letter withdrawing the United Properties Objection (the "United Properties Withdrawal"). It now appears to the Court that the Debtors have resolved these Objections by assuming the subject leases. Accordingly, upon consideration of the Motion, the United Properties Objection, the NW Palmer Objection, the United Properties Withdrawal, the record of the proceedings regarding the Motion, and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that:

1. The United Properties Objection and NW Palmer Objection are hereby withdrawn.

2. All capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Motion.

3. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over all parties to hear and determine all matters arising from the implementation of this Order.

4. Upon entry, the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on the attached service list.

RULE 9022-1 CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to LBR 9022-1, I hereby certify that true copies of the foregoing has been endorsed by or served upon all necessary parties.


Summaries of

In re Heilig-Meyers Company

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division
Aug 26, 2003
Case No. 00-34533 (Bankr. E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2003)
Case details for

In re Heilig-Meyers Company

Case Details

Full title:In re: HEILIG-MEYERS COMPANY, et al., Debtors. Chapter 11, Jointly…

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division

Date published: Aug 26, 2003

Citations

Case No. 00-34533 (Bankr. E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2003)