From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Heidecker

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 30, 2013
No. 823 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Jan. 30, 2013)

Opinion

No. 823 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

01-30-2013

In the Matter of JAMES L. HEIDECKER, JR. PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT


Nos. 22 DB 1999 & 48 DB 2000


Attorney Registration No. 19596


(Lehigh County)


ORDER

PER CURIAM :

AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2013, a Rule having been issued upon James L. Heidecker, Jr., by this Court on September 20, 2012, to show cause why an order denying reinstatement should not be entered and, upon consideration of the responses filed, the Rule is discharged and the Petition for Reinstatement is hereby granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(f), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Mr. Justice Eakin dissents.


Summaries of

In re Heidecker

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 30, 2013
No. 823 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Jan. 30, 2013)
Case details for

In re Heidecker

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES L. HEIDECKER, JR. PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2013

Citations

No. 823 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 (Pa. Jan. 30, 2013)