After carefully reviewing the petitioner’s brief and appendix, and the record, including the trial court file and the transcripts of the trial proceedings, we conclude that the findings of the court are not clearly erroneous and that its decision is correct in law. See, e.g., Haydusky’s Appeal from Probate, 201 Conn. App. 746, 747, 242 A.3d 531 (2020), cert. denied, 336 Conn. 915, 245 A.3d 424 (2021). The judgment is affirmed.

The parties have engaged in extensive litigation before the Probate Court, the Superior Court, and our appellate courts on an array of issues concerning the admission to probate of the will of the decedent, Audrey L. Hayducky, and the distribution of her estate. See Haydusky's Appeal from Probate , 201 Conn. App. 746, 242 A.3d 531 (2020), cert. denied, 336 Conn. 915, 245 A.3d 424 (2021) ; Garces v. Haydusky , Superior Court, judicial district of New Haven, Docket No. CV-20-6012595-S, 2022 WL 3444439 (June 1, 2022), appeal dismissed, Connecticut Appellate Court, Docket No. AC 45031 (November 15, 2022), cert. denied, 346 Conn. 918, 290 A.3d 800 (2023). Although the plaintiff spells her last name slightly differently from the decedent's, she is the daughter of the decedent.