See Cammer v. United States, 350 U.S. 399, 76 S.Ct. 456, 100 L.Ed. 474 (1955). I have no doubt but that one using Vallone's tactics to obtain documents from the chambers of a judge or from court personnel would be adjudged guilty of criminal contempt ( In re Hayden, 100 N.J. Eq. 50 ( Ch. 1926)), but I can find no warrant for extending that summary remedy to such action taken not in the presence of the court ( In re Caruba, 139 N.J. Eq. 404 ( Ch. 1947); Van Sweringen v. Van Sweringen, 22 N.J. 440 (1956)), but in a lawyer's office and outside the courthouse with respect to a lawyer's diary and message book. For such injuries the attorney must look to the usual remedies.