From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hawthorne

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 8, 2008
302 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-1336.

Submitted: October 22, 2008.

Decided: December 8, 2008.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:05-cr-00294-REP-1; 3:06-cv-00286-REP).

Keeble Anthony Hawthorne, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Keeble Anthony Hawthorne petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court denied relief on Hawthorne's § 2255 motion on August 14, 2008. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Hawthorne's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.


Summaries of

In re Hawthorne

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 8, 2008
302 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

In re Hawthorne

Case Details

Full title:In Re: Keeble Anthony HAWTHORNE, Petitioner

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 8, 2008

Citations

302 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2008)