From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Harrell

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
May 5, 2020
Appellate case number: 01-20-00236-CV (Tex. App. May. 5, 2020)

Opinion

Appellate case number: 01-20-00236-CV

05-05-2020

In re Artis Charles Harrell


ORDER Trial court case number: 2018-30865 Trial court: 190th District Court of Harris County

Relator, Artis Charles Harrell, has filed a motion requesting that this Court provide its reasoning for denying his petition for writ of mandamus. Relator asserts that Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 47.4 requires the court to provide its basic reasons for denying his petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 ("If the issues are settled, the court should write a brief memorandum opinion no longer than necessary to advise the parties of the court's decision and the basic reasons for it."). But Rule 47.4 only applies to memorandum opinions issued in appeals. Relator's petition for writ of mandamus is not an appeal; instead, it is an original proceeding governed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52. In original proceedings, courts of appeals are not required to provide their reasoning for denying relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."). Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED. Judge's signature: /s/ Gordon Goodman

Acting for the Court Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Goodman Date: May 5, 2020


Summaries of

In re Harrell

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
May 5, 2020
Appellate case number: 01-20-00236-CV (Tex. App. May. 5, 2020)
Case details for

In re Harrell

Case Details

Full title:In re Artis Charles Harrell

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: May 5, 2020

Citations

Appellate case number: 01-20-00236-CV (Tex. App. May. 5, 2020)