From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hardy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 7, 2019
170 A.D.3d 1323 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

PM-27-19

03-07-2019

In the MATTER OF Brettny Elaine HARDY, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 4594586)

Brettny Elaine Hardy, Oakland, California, pro se. Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.


Brettny Elaine Hardy, Oakland, California, pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: Lynch, J.P., Clark, Devine, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION

Per Curiam.

Brettny Elaine Hardy was admitted to practice by this Court in 2008 and lists a business address in San Francisco, California with the Office of Court Administration. Hardy has applied to this Court, by affidavit sworn to December 6, 2018, for leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a] ). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application, contending Hardy that is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation because she has failed to fulfill her attorney registration requirements for the most recent biennial period beginning in 2018 (see Judiciary Law § 468–a ; Matter of Lee, 148 A.D.3d 1350, 47 N.Y.S.3d 923 [2017] ; Matter of Bomba, 146 A.D.3d 1226, 1226–1227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 [2017] ; Rules of the Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 118.1).

In reply to AGC's opposition, however, Hardy has submitted correspondence indicating that she is now current in her New York attorney registration requirements. Furthermore, Office of Court Administration records likewise establish that Hardy has duly registered and cured any preexisting registration delinquency. Accordingly, with AGC voicing no other substantive objection to her application, and having determined that Hardy is now eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons (compare Matter of Tierney, 148 A.D.3d 1457, 1458, 51 N.Y.S.3d 638 [2017] ; Matter of Bomba, 146 A.D.3d at 1227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 ), we grant the application and accept her resignation.

ORDERED that Brettny Elaine Hardy's application for permission to resign is granted and her nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further

ORDERED that Brettny Elaine Hardy's name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court (see generally Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b] ); and it is further

ORDERED that Brettny Elaine Hardy is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Hardy is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or to hold herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State; and it is further

ORDERED that Brettny Elaine Hardy shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to her.

Lynch, J.P., Clark, Devine, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Hardy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 7, 2019
170 A.D.3d 1323 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

In re Hardy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BRETTNY ELAINE HARDY, an Attorney.

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 7, 2019

Citations

170 A.D.3d 1323 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
170 A.D.3d 1323
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 1705