From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hardy

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 17, 2015
600 F. App'x 773 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

2014-1577

04-17-2015

IN RE: CHRISTOPHER HARDY, R. NEAL POST, Appellants

PERRY J. SAIDMAN, Saidman DesignLaw Group, Silver Spring, MD, argued for appellants. BRIAN THOMAS RACILLA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, WILLIAM LAMARCA, THOMAS W. KRAUSE.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 29/268,198.

JUDGMENT

PERRY J. SAIDMAN, Saidman DesignLaw Group, Silver Spring, MD, argued for appellants. BRIAN THOMAS RACILLA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, WILLIAM LAMARCA, THOMAS W. KRAUSE. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 17, 2015

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Hardy

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 17, 2015
600 F. App'x 773 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Case details for

In re Hardy

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: CHRISTOPHER HARDY, R. NEAL POST, Appellants

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 17, 2015

Citations

600 F. App'x 773 (Fed. Cir. 2015)