From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hansen

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 22, 2019
2018-1595 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 22, 2019)

Opinion

2018-1595

01-22-2019

IN RE: FREDERICK S. HANSEN, DAVID A. WEBB, STEPHEN ROWLAY, Appellants

BENJAMIN LEE KIERSZ, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JACK S. BARUFKA. MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, WILLIAM LAMARCA.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/716,579.

JUDGMENT

BENJAMIN LEE KIERSZ, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by JACK S. BARUFKA. MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, WILLIAM LAMARCA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O'MALLEY, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 22, 2019

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Hansen

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 22, 2019
2018-1595 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 22, 2019)
Case details for

In re Hansen

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: FREDERICK S. HANSEN, DAVID A. WEBB, STEPHEN ROWLAY, Appellants

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 22, 2019

Citations

2018-1595 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 22, 2019)