From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hand

DISCIPLINARY REVIEW BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
Sep 29, 2010
Docket No. DRB 10-196 (N.J. Sep. 29, 2010)

Opinion

Docket No. DRB 10-196

09-29-2010

Re: In the Matter of Stephanie A. Hand

JULIANNE K. DECORE CHIEF COUNSEL ISABEL FRANK DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL ELLEN A. BRODSKY FIRST ASSISTANT COUNSEL LILLIAN LEWIN DONA S. SEROTA -TESCHNER COLIN T. TAMS KATHRYN ANNE WINTERLE ASSISTANT COUNSEL


LOUIS PASHMAN, ESQ. CHAIR
BONNIE C. FROST, ESQ. VICE-CHAIR
EDNA Y. BAUGH, ESQ.
BRUCE W. CLARK, ESQ.
JEANNE DOREMUS
HON. REGINALD STANTON
SPENCER V. WISSINGER, III
MORRIS YAMNER, ESQ.
ROBERT C. ZMIRICH JULIANNE K. DECORE
CHIEF COUNSEL ISABEL FRANK
DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL ELLEN A. BRODSKY
FIRST ASSISTANT COUNSEL LILLIAN LEWIN
DONA S. SEROTA -TESCHNER
COLIN T. TAMS
KATHRYN ANNE WINTERLE
ASSISTANT COUNSEL RICHARD J. HUGHES JUSTICE COMPLEX VIA CERTIFIED MAIL , R.R.R. & REGULAR MAIL Stephanie A. Hand
c/o Thomas R. Ashley, Esq.
50 Park Place
Suite 1400
Newark, New Jersey 07102 District Docket Nos. VC-09-903E and XIV-06-471E
LETTER OF ADMONITION Dear Ms. Hand:

The Disciplinary Review Board has reviewed your conduct in the above matter and has concluded that it was improper. Specifically, in May 2006 you represented Patricia Richardson in her purchase of real estate from Abraham George. Prior to the sale to Richardson, George entered into a "joint venture" with Elisa Gill, whereby Gill would assist him in selling the property and would receive any sale proceeds above the asking price. At the time of the sale, George was involved in a bankruptcy proceeding. You were aware of George's bankruptcy proceeding and of his agreement with Gill.

In March 2006, George's attorney filed a motion seeking the bankruptcy court's approval of the sale. The motion was denied for failure to provide for the remittance of the sale proceeds to the trustees.

Prior to the May 1, 2006 closing, you did not ascertain that the court had approved the sale. Although you asked your staff to obtain a copy of the order from George's attorney and were informed that the copy was being faxed to your office, you proceeded with the closing without a copy of the order, relying instead on George's representation that "everything went fine" on the return date of the motion.

As it turned out, the sale was for $200,000 above the price listed on the contract attached to the motion to the bankruptcy court and named a different buyer. Neither George's attorney nor the trustee knew about the sale until later. Because George led you to believe that he would have the bankruptcy dismissed, you were unaware that the proceeds were to be turned over to the trustee and, in fact, did not do so. Ultimately, you returned your fee, after the trustee obtained an order of disgorgement. The court later approved the sale nunc pro tunc.

In mitigation, the Board considered your lack of prior discipline, and the testimony offered by several witnesses about your competency, honesty, and integrity as an attorney.

In failing to act with diligence and failing to ensure that the sale met with the court's approval in every respect, you violated RPC 1.3 and RPC 8.4(d).

Your conduct has adversely reflected not only upon you as an attorney but also upon all members of the bar. Accordingly, the Board has directed the issuance of this admonition to you. R. 1:20-15(f)(4).

A permanent record of this occurrence has been filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court and the Board's office. Should you become the subject of any further discipline, it will be taken into consideration.

The Board has also directed that the costs of the disciplinary proceedings be assessed against you. An invoice of costs will be forwarded under separate cover.

Very truly yours,

/s/

Julianne K. DeCore

Chief Counsel JKD/paa c: Chief Justice Stuart Rabner

Associate Justices

Louis Pashman, Chair

Disciplinary Review Board

Mark Neary, Clerk

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Gail G. Haney, Deputy Clerk

Supreme Court of New Jersey (w/ethics history)

Charles Centinaro, Director

Office of Attorney Ethics

Andrew M. Epstein, Chair, District VC Ethics Committee

Seth Ptasiewicz, Secretary, District VC Ethics Committee

Joseph Petrolino, Esq., Grievant


Summaries of

In re Hand

DISCIPLINARY REVIEW BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
Sep 29, 2010
Docket No. DRB 10-196 (N.J. Sep. 29, 2010)
Case details for

In re Hand

Case Details

Full title:Re: In the Matter of Stephanie A. Hand

Court:DISCIPLINARY REVIEW BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Sep 29, 2010

Citations

Docket No. DRB 10-196 (N.J. Sep. 29, 2010)

Citing Cases

In re Hand

In addition to imposing the admonition, we required respondent to return her fee to her client. In the Matter…

In re Hand

Respondent was ordered to return her fee to her client. In the Matter of Stephanie A. Hand, DRB 10-196…