From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hanchey

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Nov 2, 2000
761 A.2d 279 (D.C. 2000)

Opinion

No. 99-BG-267

Submitted October 10, 2000

Decided November 2, 2000

On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility.

Before Steadman and Reid, Associate Judges, and Pryor, Senior Judge.


Before us is a reciprocal discipline case. The Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board accepted respondent's resignation and revoked his license to practice law in that state. Subsequently, this court entered an order temporarily suspending respondent and directing the Board on Professional Responsibility to recommend whether reciprocal discipline should be imposed.

Under the Virginia rules, information underlying this proceeding is confidential and was transmitted to Bar Counsel subject to that condition. Cf. D.C. Bar R. XI, § 12(c) (Disbarment by Consent).

The Board has submitted a report and recommendation that respondent be disbarred in the District of Columbia, pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(c)(4). We have previously noted the distinction between revocation of a license, analogous to an indefinite suspension but permitting a petition for reinstatement at any time, and disbarment, with its mandatory five-year minimum term. In re Brickle, 521 A.2d 271, 273 (D.C. 1987). Our usual deferential standard to Board recommendations "becomes even more deferential where, as here, the attorney [and Bar Counsel] ha[ve both] failed to contest the proposed sanction." In re Hitselberger, No. 99-BG-57, slip op. at 2 (D.C. October 26, 2000) (citations omitted). We have examined the entire record, see In re Sheridan, 680 A.2d 439, 440 (D.C. 1996), and adopt the Board's recommendation. Accordingly, it is

That subsection permits a departure from the norm of identical reciprocal discipline where the foreign conduct "warrants substantially different discipline in the District of Columbia."

ORDERED that respondent is disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia effective forthwith. Respondent's attention is drawn to the provisions of D.C. Bar R. XI, §§ 14 and 16(c) dealing with the requirements imposed upon disbarred attorneys and their effect on the time period for a petition of reinstatement.


Summaries of

In re Hanchey

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Nov 2, 2000
761 A.2d 279 (D.C. 2000)
Case details for

In re Hanchey

Case Details

Full title:In re Brian P. Hanchey, Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the District of…

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 2, 2000

Citations

761 A.2d 279 (D.C. 2000)