From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Interest of N.H.

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Sep 23, 2015
871 N.W.2d 705 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

finding no due process violation where father "was represented by counsel, who was present throughout the hearing, cross-examined witnesses, and presented the father’s case to the juvenile court"

Summary of this case from In re L.J.

Opinion

No. 15–0691.

09-23-2015

In the Interest of N.H., Minor Child, S.H., Father, Appellant.

Mark Milder, Waverly, for appellant father. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kathrine S. Miller–Todd, Assistant Attorney General, Linda Fangman, County Attorney, and Steven Halbach and Kathleen Hahn, Assistant County Attorneys, for appellee State. Melissa Anderson Seeber of the Waterloo Juvenile Public Defender, Waterloo, attorney and guardian ad litem for minor child.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

In re Interest of N.H.

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Sep 23, 2015
871 N.W.2d 705 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

finding no due process violation where father "was represented by counsel, who was present throughout the hearing, cross-examined witnesses, and presented the father’s case to the juvenile court"

Summary of this case from In re L.J.

denying father's argument that his constitutional rights were violated when the court denied his request to appear personally or telephonically during termination hearing and when the court denied his motion for a continuance of the termination hearing

Summary of this case from In re J.G.
Case details for

In re Interest of N.H.

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of N.H., Minor Child, S.H., Father, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Sep 23, 2015

Citations

871 N.W.2d 705 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

In re L.J.

[Her] due process rights were not violated."); In re N.H. , No. 15-0691, 2015 WL 5577069, at *3 (Iowa Ct.…

In re K.K.

However, as we have said in the past, it is preferable for a parent to be present—either in person,…