From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hale

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 22, 2020
No. 20-1012 (4th Cir. Jun. 22, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-1012

06-22-2020

In re: STEVE HALE, Petitioner.

Steve Hale, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:13-cr-00280-MOC-DSC-1; 3:18-cv-00383-MOC) Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steve Hale, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steve Hale petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that on January 22, 2020, the district court denied relief on Hale's § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Hale's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Hale

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 22, 2020
No. 20-1012 (4th Cir. Jun. 22, 2020)
Case details for

In re Hale

Case Details

Full title:In re: STEVE HALE, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 22, 2020

Citations

No. 20-1012 (4th Cir. Jun. 22, 2020)