From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hain

New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
May 30, 2024
209 N.Y.S.3d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)

Opinion

Attorney Registration No. 5723721

05-30-2024

In the MATTER OF Charyn Kay HAIN, an Attorney.

Charyn Kay Hain, Rockford, Michigan, pro se. Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.


Charyn Kay Hain, Rockford, Michigan, pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Aarons and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION

Per Curiam.

Charyn Kay Hain was admitted to practice by this Court in 2020 and lists a business address in Grand Rapids, Michigan with the Office of Court Administration. Hain now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22[a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) advises that it does not oppose Hain’s application.

Upon reading Hain’s affidavit sworn to April 9, 2024 and filed April 12, 2024, and upon reading the May 21, 2024 correspondence in response by the Deputy Chief Attorney for AGC, and having determined that Hain is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, we grant her application and accept her resignation.

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Aarons and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that Charyn Kay Hain’s ap plication for permission to resign is granted and her nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further

ORDERED that Charyn Kay Hain’s name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court (see generally Rules for Atty Disciplinary Mat- ters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22[b]); and it is further

ORDERED that Charyn Kay Hain is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Hain is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or to hold herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State; and it is further

ORDERED that Charyn Kay Hain shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to her.


Summaries of

In re Hain

New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
May 30, 2024
209 N.Y.S.3d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)
Case details for

In re Hain

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Charyn Kay HAIN, an Attorney.

Court:New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Date published: May 30, 2024

Citations

209 N.Y.S.3d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)