From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Haddad

U.S.
Jun 8, 2009
129 S. Ct. 2769 (2009)

Opinion

No. 08-9603

June 8, 2009.


The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in non-criminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) ( per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.


Summaries of

In re Haddad

U.S.
Jun 8, 2009
129 S. Ct. 2769 (2009)
Case details for

In re Haddad

Case Details

Full title:IN RE CONSTANCE E. HADDAD

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 8, 2009

Citations

129 S. Ct. 2769 (2009)